I apologise for the lengthy information.
In short. In the same way Muslim scholars present newly Muslim converts on stage as a proof of their apologetic approach, Secularists and Ex-Muslim societies presented this case as a strong counter example: "A Well-Defeated Muslim Apologist".
Anyone can go to Islamic book stores and buy the famous videotape entitled “The Great Debate between Ahmed Deedat and the well known American Evangelical Jimmy Swaggart”. Muslims usually show this tape to their Christian friends as proof of Islam’s superiority. Although he is not a famous scholar, Jalal's the case is at least a counter example that Christians can enjoy and discuss with their Muslim friends as a proof of the superiority of Christianity.
As you said, may be we should not care, since he eventually got what he deserved ... there is nothing more humiliating!
|
11-11-21, 00:40
To save us the turmoil of having to read all this stuff, can you summarise in a few sentences for us, exactly what this is all about and what conclusions you think we should arrive at. Why should we care about the views of some crazed individual we don't even know? Once I am clearer in my own mind, I will offer you my own views on the subject.
Hybrid Mode
